HearTheGear.com
Username   Password  
Register |  Forgot Password?

Baby Animal vs ISA428



Date: 12/07/2009  
Project Type: shootout
Views: 152

Submitted by:
 
 
Play Clip Preamp
  Hear clip 1 JLM Baby Animal OPA2604
  Hear clip 2 JLM Baby Animal OPA2604
  Hear clip 3 JLM Baby Animal OPA2604
  Hear clip 4 Focusrite ISA 428
  Hear clip 5 Focusrite ISA 428
  Hear clip 6 Focusrite ISA 428
Test Your Ears! Match the clips to the gear that made them.
Play Clip
Refresh
Hear Mystery Clip
 
Hear Mystery Clip
 
Hear Mystery Clip
 
Hear Mystery Clip
 
Hear Mystery Clip
 
Hear Mystery Clip
 

 Description 
These are separate takes. I was careful to match the levels and mic placement with the vocals and the acoustic guitar. Samples 1-3 each have the same start point, as do 4-6 so you can sync them up if you want to hear a "mix" with the same preamp stacked.

This JLM version is the least expensive version using an OPA2604 IC as an opamp and the JLM14 input transformer. The DI is a FET DI. Fun kit to build, btw.

I think I like the BA on bass, but I think I prefer the ISA on vocal. They do have a different sound. The ISA sounds "tighter" whereas the BA sounds beefier, to me. I'd love to know your opinions.

There are 2 comments about this project:
tenchijin - December 10 2009
I think I'd like to try another baby animal with the JLM99V opamp and the output transformer for comparison.
rackrecording - January 29 2010
The ISA is brighter, but it felt like the BA was dynamically tighter. It felt more under control where the Focusrite jumped around and the S's were a bit sharper on the Focusrite. A good compressor might tame the ISA but if I were going to take these takes as-is I'd go with the BA clips. Just seems like they'd be easier to fit in a mix.
Please login or register to post a comment


Home l Browse Recordings l Upload Recordings l About HTG l Gear Reviews l Classifieds l Links
Contact Us l Advertise on HTG


Copyright © 2006-2009 Multi Hat Media. All rights reserved.